🔗 Share this article

In a notable regulatory appeal, a national review panel has reversed a prior decision that blocked Australian-based users from accessing video footage of the shooting incident involving influencer Charlie Kirk. The appeal was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an order sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the eSafety commissioner petitioned the review board to assess and rate the circulating video. The board initially ruled the content was "unable to be classified", a rating that empowered the commissioner to order platforms to geo-block the posts for an Australian audience.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a similar ruling on another piece of footage—depicting the attack on Iryna Zarutska on a train in Charlotte—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. It was argued the recording was low-quality and the camera quickly panned away from the victim to the bystanders.

X maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, exploitative, or offensive, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that generated extensive public discourse". X even compared the footage and the well-known recording of President John F. Kennedy's assassination.

Most members of the classification panel concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to justify a complete ban. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with alternative commentary could have met that threshold. Consequently, the panel changed the classification of the content to R18+.

The Minority Viewpoint

Some on the panel disagreed, arguing the post was "content designed for sharing for the likely purposes of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as likes, shares, or views)". This view stated the comparison to the Zapruder JFK film was flawed, as the Kennedy video was released years after the event, "once emotions regarding it had subsided".

Response Following the Decision

Posting on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this decision to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of access to information about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains committed to protecting these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but noted that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "have obligations to prevent R18+ material is not accessible to Australians who are minors".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

In related news, the eSafety commissioner did not issue take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding graphic footage from the recent Bondi beach terror attack shared across social media. Officials commented that while the images were upsetting, they had not met the required standard for a "total ban" rating.

Instead, the companies have been instructed to use sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as blurring, on such content in accordance with their existing community guidelines.